<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Thinking inside a bigger box - Latest Comments in Link: Open Source in the Enterprise</title><link>http://thinkinginsideabiggerbox.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://thinkinginsideabiggerbox.disqus.com/link_open_source_in_the_enterprise/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 11:19:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Link: Open Source in the Enterprise</title><link>http://johannesbrodwall.com/2007/03/11/link-open-source-in-the-enterprise/#comment-1798001</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, Niraj&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why should there be a architecture department? (I am in one, and I am wondering about this)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Johannes Brodwall</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 11:19:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Link: Open Source in the Enterprise</title><link>http://johannesbrodwall.com/2007/03/11/link-open-source-in-the-enterprise/#comment-1798000</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What should the architecture department be doing?&lt;br&gt;architecture department must be able to pick  particular pieces of open source    products and make that fit into his architecture.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Niraj Manandhar</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:52:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>