http://thinkinginsideabiggerbox.disqus.com/enThu, 03 Jul 2008 08:35:51 -0000http://www.brodwall.com/johannes/blog/2008/07/02/testing-avoid-setup-and-teardown/#comment-1799205Agreed! I think it is important that a test method can be read as a sequence of steps, but the steps can be reusable methods. So I do extract the gory details of actually performing the step, but I usually don't extract a subsequence of steps as a new method. And of course, I try to give the methods as good names as possible, as always.Christian RørdamThu, 03 Jul 2008 08:35:51 -0000http://www.brodwall.com/johannes/blog/2008/07/02/testing-avoid-setup-and-teardown/#comment-1799204Agreed! I often find myself refactoring setup methods to factories called by the individual tests whenever I come across tests that need to do some prep work before they can run. Makes things much easier to grasp when you revisit the test fixtures later.Anders NoråsThu, 03 Jul 2008 07:31:34 -0000