http://thinkinginsideabiggerbox.disqus.com/enThu, 03 Jul 2008 04:35:51 -0000http://johannesbrodwall.com/2008/07/02/testing-avoid-setup-and-teardown/#comment-1799205<p>Agreed! I think it is important that a test method can be read as a sequence of steps, but the steps can be reusable methods. So I do extract the gory details of actually performing the step, but I usually don't extract a subsequence of steps as a new method. And of course, I try to give the methods as good names as possible, as always.</p>Christian RørdamThu, 03 Jul 2008 04:35:51 -0000http://johannesbrodwall.com/2008/07/02/testing-avoid-setup-and-teardown/#comment-1799204<p>Agreed! I often find myself refactoring setup methods to factories called by the individual tests whenever I come across tests that need to do some prep work before they can run. Makes things much easier to grasp when you revisit the test fixtures later.</p>Anders NoråsThu, 03 Jul 2008 03:31:34 -0000