<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Thinking inside a bigger box - Latest Comments in When Quicker isn't Quicker</title><link>http://thinkinginsideabiggerbox.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:02:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: When Quicker isn't Quicker</title><link>http://www.brodwall.com/johannes/blog/2007/08/09/when-quicker-isnt-quicker/#comment-1798621</link><description>Now everybody wants me to code? Okay, I promise that I'll sit down some time and redo the problem in Ruby and also in Java (it's actually an interesting proposition)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Johannes Brodwall</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:02:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Quicker isn't Quicker</title><link>http://www.brodwall.com/johannes/blog/2007/08/09/when-quicker-isnt-quicker/#comment-1798620</link><description>What is your "performance" in Java?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stein Kåre Skytteren</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 07:03:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Quicker isn't Quicker</title><link>http://www.brodwall.com/johannes/blog/2007/08/09/when-quicker-isnt-quicker/#comment-1798622</link><description>Try implementing it in Ruby again.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sverre H. Huseby</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 06:17:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>